Connect with us

News

Oyo ALGON Asks Bisi Ilaka To Seek Knowledge Over LG Election, Raises Four Crucial Points

Published

on

By Abiodun Ogunrinde, Ibadan

The Association of Local Government of Nigeria (ALGON), Oyo State Chapter, has urged the Chief of staff to Governor Seyi Makinde to seek knowledge over the local government election.

This is coming as a reaction to the state government’s claim that the local government election conducted by Former Governor Abiola Ajimobi was done against a court order.

OSUN DIGITAL MEDIA WEEK: OOPA Opens Portal For Free Award Voting

In a press release made available to
CityMirrorNews which was signed by ALGON chairman, Ayodeji Abass-Aleshinloye, the body raised four crucial points concerning the last local government election in the state.

It reads “In its response to its act of illegality of dissolving democratically elected local government administration, all discerning minds expected Oyo State Government to defend its act of lawlessness and contempt of a subsisting court judgement on point of law and on absolute truth.

But unfortunately, Governor Seyi Makinde administration opted for the path of ‘white lies’, arrogance and executive lawlessness.

“1. Unlike the concocted lies spewed to the press by Makinde’s Chief of Staff, Chief Bisi Ilaka, we hereby restate that the local government election conducted during the administration of the ex-governor Abiola Ajimobi was never conducted
against a Court Order.
The court order that Chief Ilaka ‘got stranded with’ was vacated on May 10, 2018.

There was an order of the Federal High Court Ibadan restraining the OYSEIC prior to our election
from conducting the said election but the said order was discharged on the 10th May 2018 by Justice Joyce Abdul Malik of the Federal High Court sitting in Ibadan while delivering her judgement on the suit FHC/IB/CS/47/2018 (Olugbenga Adeyemi & Others V INEC, OYSIEC, and OYSG) paving ways for the Local Government election which was
conducted on d 12th May 2018.

“2. Do not ridicule the Judiciary.
It is very ridiculous and scary for a top government official of Chief Ilaka status to describe a judgment of a competent court that restrained Oyo State government from dissolving a
duly elected local government as an ‘arranged judgement’. We advise Oyo State government not to do anything that will bring the Judiciary, an independent arm of government, to ridicule and opprobrium in the face of the public. Such uncouth language expressed by Governor Makinde’s chief of staff should have been left on the soapbox after political campaigns and not be used in the arena of civil governance. Governance is a serious business, so the government should be civil in conduct and public discourse. The only constitutional way to redress any court judgment is to appeal not to disparage it or result to self help.

“3. Advising ALGON to go to court by Chief Ilaka on behalf of his employer is hypocritical and self-contradictory. How can a lawless government whose spokesperson described a court judgement as ‘arranged’ now turn around to advise ALGON to go to court? Do they have the sincerity and credibility when the same government that flouted and derided court now advised that we should go to court? This government is not competent to so advise, our lawyers are already in court to do needful and
also, proceed with a contempt of court case against the state government.
“4. All court judgments are valid. The new government in Oyo State Should be enlightened that all court orders/judgements are valid until a higher court upturned them. It is dangerous for a state government to declare that it would only respect a court order that is valid as Governor Makinde’s Chief of Staff arrogantly stated to the press. Anarchy results when individual or government cherry-pick which court judgement he / it considers valid or not. Constitutional democracy is about the rule of law not the rule of men.

“We advise Oyo State government to always tow the path of civility and rule of law. It has no power to dissolve a democratically elected local
government, more so when there is a subsisting perpetual injunction/judgement by a competent
court of law,”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending